The Urgency of Regulating Asset Confiscation Without Conviction for Effective Corruption Eradication
Keywords:
Asset Confiscation Without Conviction, Corruption Eradication, Asset Recovery, Social Justice.Abstract
This study examines the urgency of establishing legal regulations regarding non-conviction-based asset forfeiture, or the confiscation of assets without conviction, in the Indonesian legal system. This mechanism is seen as a step towards reforming economic criminal law to address the weaknesses of the system, which has so far focused solely on punishing perpetrators. Many corruption cases are not followed by the restitution of state losses because the assets obtained from the crime have been hidden, diverted, or are no longer accessible through conventional criminal mechanisms. This study aims to examine the philosophical, juridical, and sociological foundations of this concept and formulate an ideal design that aligns with the principles of the rule of law and the Indonesian constitution.
The research approach used is a juridical normative one, with a review of various laws and regulations, policy documents, and comparative practices from other countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and Singapore. The analysis shows that the basis for implementing asset confiscation without conviction has international legitimacy through the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), which Indonesia ratified through Law Number 7 of 2006. At the national level, the draft law on Asset Forfeiture, which has been included in the National Legislation Program, is an important momentum to close the legal vacuum in recovering assets resulting from criminal acts. This study concludes that regulating asset confiscation without conviction is crucial for increasing the effectiveness of corruption eradication while strengthening social justice. With strict judicial oversight, proportional standards of proof, and protection for parties acting in good faith, this mechanism does not conflict with human rights. Instead, this policy emphasizes the role of law as a means of restoring state finances and public welfare, while also embodying Indonesia's commitment to the principles of good governance and clean governance.
References
Azwar, Muhammad Fuad; Karim, MS; Haeranah. 2022. The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture as a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption. Legal Brief, Vol.11 No.5, 2613-2622.
Huda, Muhammad Nurul; Mardhatillah, Safira Ila; Ayunisa, Qurota; Munjiyah, Amrina; Nugroho, Afrizal Eko. 2025. Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture: Presumption of Innocence and Principle of Legality Perspective. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), Vol.7 No.1, 98-112.
Nasution, Adhitya Anugrah; Riswadi, Riswadi. 2024. Legal Reconstruction of Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture for State Loss Recovery from Corruption Crimes. RETURN: Study of Management, Economics and Business, Vol.3 No.11.
Sakinah, Tri Indah; Sumardiana, Benny. 2025. Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Policy Concept through In Rem Lawsuit Based on Economic Analysis of Law. Legal Research Journal (JRH), Vol.29 No.1.
Pratisthita, Ni Wayan Gita; Latumeten, Pieter E. 2023. Implementation Implications of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture on Notaries Whose Authentic Deeds Are Indicated as Means of Money Laundering. IJSSR, Vol.3 No.11, Article 578.
Aldino, Masagus Rizki; Susanti, Emilia. 2025. The Urgency Of Regulation Of Non Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture In Corruption Criminal Acts In Indonesia. SEHASEN Law Journal, Vol.11 No.1, 97-.
Prayatno, Dwidja. 2018. Non Conviction Based NCB Asset Forfeiture for Recovering the Corruption Proceeds in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, Vol.9 No.1, 219-233.
Fauzia, Ana; Hamdani, Fathul. 2021. Legal Development Through the Implementation of Non-Conviction Based Concepts in Money Laundering Asset Recovery Practices in Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights 2021 (ICLHR 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research Vol.592.
Setiawan, Junet Hariyo; Solikhin, Solikhin. 2025. The Urgency of Enacting Asset Forfeiture Legislation in the Recovery of State Finances from Corruption. SSRN Working Paper.
Wulandari, Farida; Respationo, Soerya; Erniyanti, Erniyanti. 2024. Juridical Analysis of the Mechanism of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture in the Settlement of Corruption Crimes. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity (IJSS), Vol.1 No.3.
Wulandari, Farida. 2024. Juridical Analysis of the Mechanism of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture: Case Study Batam City. IJSS, Vol.1 No.3.
Hiariej, Eddy O. 2013. Recovery of Criminal Assets. Jurnal Opinio Juris, Vol.13 No.1.
Saputra, Refki. 2017. Challenges in Implementing Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture in the Asset Confiscation Bill in Indonesia. Integrity: Anti-Corruption Journal, Vol.3 No.1, 115-130.
Mohd Ansor Lubis, Mhd.; Lubis, Hera Fauziah; Zulyadi, Rizkan. 2024. Introduction to State Science Complete with Classical to Modern Forms of State and Government. Jakarta: Eureka Media Aksara.
Naf, Irwan Hafid. 2021. Asset Confiscation Without Criminal Imprisonment in the Perspective of Economic Analysis of Law. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol.6 No.3.
Aldino, M.; Susanti, E. 2025. The Urgency of Implementing Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture in Corruption Criminal Acts in Indonesia. SEHASEN Law Journal, Vol.11 No.1.
Grace, A.; Riswadi, R. 2024. Legal Reconstruction of Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture for State Loss Recovery from Corruption Crimes. RETURN, Vol.3 No.11.
Kurniawan, Itok Dwi; Soehartono; Setyawan, Vincentius Patria; Gama Santos, Jose. 2024. The Implementation of Non-Conviction-Based Forfeiture in ASEAN, Mongolia and Timor-Leste. UNODC ROSE-AP Paper.
Nasution, Adhitya; Riswadi. 2024. Legal Reconstruction of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture for State Loss Recovery from Corruption Crimes. RETURN, Vol.3 No.11.
The World Bank/UNODC Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR). 2009. A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. Washington DC: World Bank.
UNODC ROSE-AP. 2024. The Implementation of Non-Conviction-Based Forfeiture in ASEAN, Mongolia and Timor-Leste. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
United Nations. 2003. United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). New York: United Nations.
Brun, Jean-Pierre. 2011. Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners. Washington DC: World Bank.
Alldridge, Peter. 2003. Money Laundering Law: Forfeiture, Confiscation, Civil Recovery, Criminal Laundering and Taxation of the Proceeds of Crime. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
United Kingdom. 2002. Proceedings of Crime Act 2002. London: UK Legislation.
United States of America. 18 USC § 981 and 21 USC § 881. 2002. Civil Forfeiture Statutes. Washington DC: US Government.
Husein, Y. 2012. Asset Forfeiture of Crime in Indonesia. Indonesian Legislation Journal, Vol.7 No.4, 41-.
Ramelan. 2015. Report on the Results of the Harmonization of the Academic Manuscript of the Draft Law on Confiscation of Criminal Assets. Jakarta: National Legal Development Agency (BPHN).
Pohan, A. 2008. Return of Criminal Assets. Yogyakarta: Center for Anti-Corruption Studies, Faculty of Law, UGM & Partnership.
Supomo. 2005. Civil Procedure Law. Jakarta: PT Praptomo Paramita.
Solichul Mukminah, Lily; Hartiwiningsih; Otto Yudianto. 2023. The Importance of Regulating Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) in Corruption Cases in Indonesia. IBLAM Law Review, Vol.3 No.1.
Setiawan, Junet Hariyo; Solikhin, Solikhin. 2025. The Urgency of Enacting Asset Forfeiture Legislation in the Recovery of State Finances from Corruption. SSRN Working Paper.
Lasmadi, S.; Sudarti, E. 2021. Reversed Proof in Money Laundering Crimes. Legal Reflections Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.5 No.2, 199-2018.
Mulyadi, L. 2020. Ideal Asset Recovery Model: Perpetrators of Corruption. Jakarta: (Thesis) University of Indonesia.
Itok Dwi Kurniawan et al. 2024. The Implementation of Non-Conviction-Based Forfeiture in ASEAN, Mongolia and Timor-Leste. UNODC ROSE-AP.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ismaidar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




