Availability & Quality of Public Open Spaces (POS) in the Medan–Deli Serdang Border Area
Keywords:
Public Open Spaces (POS), Medan–Deli Serdang Border Area, Spatial Accessibility, SWOT Analysis, Spatial InequalityAbstract
The Medan–Deli Serdang border area is experiencing high urbanization pressure, making the availability and quality of Public Open Spaces (POS) crucial for public health, social inclusion, and environmental resilience. This study aims to assess the adequacy of POS in terms of quantity (coverage, distribution, and accessibility) and quality (comfort, safety, facilities, and ecological value), while also mapping the enabling and hindering factors in cross-administrative management. A descriptive–quantitative approach was employed, supported by a Strengths–Weaknesses–Opportunities–Threats (SWOT) analysis. Availability audits were conducted by calculating POS area per capita (square meters per person), spatial distribution analysis using Geographic Information System (GIS) with 400–800 meter pedestrian buffers and network analysis, and typology classification such as neighborhood parks, city parks, river corridors, and town squares. Quality audits used a composite index encompassing accessibility, thermal comfort and vegetation, safety, facilities, maintenance, and ecology, based on field surveys and user assessments.
The results indicate spatial disparities: several densely populated settlements are more than a 10-minute walk from functional POS, while some green spaces are not connected to the pedestrian network. The per capita area ratio and service coverage in several border districts remain below recommended standards, especially in newly growing zones. In terms of quality, median scores fall into the moderate category, with strengths in tree cover along river corridors and active communal spaces, and weaknesses in maintenance, nighttime lighting, universal access, and completeness of play and sports facilities. SWOT analysis identifies opportunities for integrating POS with river corridor rejuvenation programs, developing cycling and pedestrian networks, and strengthening cross-district coordination, but faces threats such as land conversion, governance fragmentation, and roadside parking pressure.
Findings emphasize that the main issues are not only insufficient area but also uneven access and management quality. Priority improvements should focus on enhancing connectivity between POS through green corridors and sidewalks, revitalizing space quality through increased tree shading, lighting, and inclusive facilities, and establishing cross-border coordination mechanisms for planning, funding, and uniform service standards. Overall, strengthening a well-connected, inclusive, and well-maintained POS network is considered more effective than adding new fragmented sites.
References
World Health Organization (WHO), Urban Green Space Interventions and Health: A Review of Impacts and Effectiveness, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), Global Public Space Toolkit: From Global Principles to Local Policies and Practice, Nairobi: UN-Habitat, 2015.
Natural England, Nature Nearby: Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance (ANGSt), London: Natural England, 2010.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No. 05/PRT/M/2008: Guidelines for the Provision and Utilization of Urban Green Open Space (Permen PU 05/2008), Jakarta: Ministry of Public Works, 2008.
President of the Republic of Indonesia, Presidential Regulation No. 62 of 2011 on the Spatial Plan for the Medan–Binjai–Deli Serdang–Karo Urban Area (Mebidangro), Jakarta: Government of Indonesia, 2011.
European Environment Agency (EEA), Who Benefits from Nature in Cities? Social Inequalities in Access to Urban Green and Blue Spaces across Europe, Copenhagen: EEA, 2022.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), City-Wide Public Space Assessment: A Guide to Community-Led Digital Inventory and Assessment, Nairobi: UN-Habitat, 2020.
C. Twohig-Bennett and A. Jones, “The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes,” Environmental Research, vol. 166, pp. 628–637, 2018.
Fields in Trust, Standards: Creating Great Spaces for All, London: Fields in Trust, 2024.
Esri, Service Area Analysis Layer—ArcGIS Pro Documentation, Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), 2024.
G. Boeing, OSMnx 2.0.6: Modeling Urban Street Networks with OpenStreetMap, OpenStreetMap Foundation, 2025.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Comparative analysis of five observational audit tools for parks,” Preventing Chronic Disease, vol. 13, art. no. E173, 2016.
J. R. Wolch, J. Byrne, and J. P. Newell, “Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough,’” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 125, pp. 234–244, 2014.
M. M. Helms and J. Nixon, “Exploring SWOT analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade,” Journal of Strategy and Management, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 215–251, 2010.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Kota Medan, Kota Medan dalam Angka 2025, Medan: BPS, 2025; Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Kabupaten Deli Serdang dalam Angka 2024, Lubuk Pakam: BPS, 2024.
Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, Peraturan Menteri PU No. 05/PRT/M/2008 tentang Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan RTH di Kawasan Perkotaan, Jakarta: Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, 2008.
Natural England, Accessible Natural Greenspace Standard (ANGSt): Guidance for Local Authorities, London: Natural England, 2020.
C. Twohig-Bennett and A. Jones, “The Health Benefits of the Great Outdoors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Greenspace Exposure and Health Outcomes,” Environmental Research, vol. 166, pp. 628–637, 2018.
World Health Organization (WHO), Urban Green Spaces and Health: A Review of Evidence, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016.
UN-Habitat, Global Public Space Toolkit: From Global Principles to Local Policies, Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muzakir Riza, Abdiyanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




