Reconstruction of Subjective Conditions for Detention in the Criminal Procedure Code Based on Due Process of Law

Authors

  • Hendro Gunawan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Mhd. Azhali Siregar Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Henry Aspan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Detention; Criminal Procedure Code; Subjective Requirements; Due Process of Law; Human Rights.

Abstract

Detention, as a form of coercive action in criminal procedure law, has direct consequences for the restriction of human rights, particularly the right to personal liberty. Therefore, its implementation must be strictly implemented based on the principles of legal certainty and due process of law. However, the regulation of subjective conditions for detention in the Criminal Procedure Code, particularly regarding the "concern" that the suspect will flee, destroy evidence, or repeat the crime, remains abstract and lacks measurable indicators. This condition opens up wide discretion for investigators and has the potential to create legal uncertainty and abuse of authority. This study aims to analyze the problematic regulation of subjective conditions for detention from the perspective of legal certainty and due process of law, and to formulate an ideal normative reconstruction to guarantee the protection of suspects' rights. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, supported by an analysis of pretrial decisions and law enforcement practices in the North Sumatra Regional Police. The results show that the subjective conditions for detention in the Criminal Procedure Code do not have clear parameters, are multi-interpretable, and tend to place investigators' authority dominantly without an effective control mechanism. This has resulted in weak protection of suspects' rights and suboptimal implementation of the principle of due process of law. Therefore, norm reconstruction is needed through the formulation of objective indicators, limitations on investigators' discretion, and strengthening of judicial oversight mechanisms through pretrial proceedings. This research is expected to contribute to the development of criminal procedure law in Indonesia, particularly in realizing a more measurable, accountable, and human rights-oriented detention system.

References

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2020. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hamzah, Andi. 2019. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Yahya. 2016. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2017. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mulyadi, Lilik. 2018. Hukum Acara Pidana: Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2009. Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Soekanto, Soerjono. 2015. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Siregar, Mhd. Azhali. 2024. Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Medan: Pustaka Prima.

Siregar, Mhd. Azhali., Adrian, Rahul Fikri., dan Rambe, Muhammad Juang. 2023. Menelusuri Perjalanan Lahirnya Konsep Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Tahta Media.

Aspan, Henry. 2021. “Diskresi Aparat Penegak Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum.

Gemilang, Gilang., dan Ismaidar. 2024. “Politik Hukum Restorative Justice dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Journal of Social Science Research.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. 2021. “Due Process of Law dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 18, No. 3.

Hasbi, Mhd., Lubis, Muhammad Dhobit Azhary., dan Sitompul, Ariman. 2025. “Analisis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Kasus Pemalsuan Surat dan Akta Autentik di Kota Medan (Studi Putusan No. 22/Pid.Pra/2025/PN Mdn).” Law Jurnal, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Ramadani, Suci. 2023. “Protection of Human Rights Against Victims of Trafficking.” Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1.

Siregar, R. 2021. “Efektivitas Praperadilan dalam Menguji Keabsahan Penahanan.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Vol. 6, No. 2.

Republik Indonesia. 1981. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).

Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Pengadilan Negeri Medan. 2025. Putusan Praperadilan Nomor 22/Pid.Pra/2025/PN Mdn.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. 2015. Putusan Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>