A Neuroscience-Based Pre-Crime Deradicalization Model: A Legal Approach and Preventive Policy in Indonesia

Authors

  • T. Riza Zarzani Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Rahmayanti Universitas Pembanguan Panca Budi
  • M Ammar Al Ghifari Universitas Pembanguan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Pre-Crime Deradicalization, Neuroscience, EEG, Preventive Policy

Abstract

This study develops a neuroscience-based pre-crime deradicalization model as a preventive legal and policy approach in Indonesia. The problem is the expansion of criminalization to the pre-crime stage without an objective operational protocol for referring exposed subjects to voluntary services. A normative juridical approach is combined with neuroscience studies of inhibitory control through go-no-go and stop-signal tasks measured using portable EEG. Neurocognitive indicators are positioned to support a multi-layered assessment that includes clinical interviews, psychometrics, and social observation. The model emphasizes the principle of proportionality, separation of service domains from law enforcement, informed consent, neuroprivacy, and data quality standards and retesting.

The study's findings suggest that policy precedents in drug rehabilitation regimes can be adapted for pre-crime deradicalization to minimize the substantive justice gap. The proposed operational design includes a voluntary, community-based referral pathway, a multi-layered assessment with non-deterministic neurocognitive indicators, a recovery intervention package emphasizing executive function strengthening and values ​​counseling, and periodic evaluations. This integration provides a more measurable, evidentiary basis for service decisions without compromising human rights and freedom of thought. In conclusion, an ethical and accountable neuroscience-based pre-crime deradicalization model can complement law enforcement, strengthen prevention at the earliest stages, and enhance the effectiveness of public policy.

References

Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Law No. 15 of 2003 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Summary of the contents and links to the manuscript in the BPK regulations database.

Government Regulation No. 77 of 2019 concerning the Prevention of Criminal Acts of Terrorism and the Protection of Investigators, Public Prosecutors, Judges, and Correctional Officers. The Cabinet Secretariat's official explanation of Articles 2 and 29.

BNPT. Institutional information and deradicalization coordination in accordance with the mandate of PP 77 of 2019 Article 29.

Cabinet Secretariat. The context of prevention, counter-radicalization, and deradicalization in Government Regulation No. 77 of 2019.

Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Provisions on rehabilitation and mandatory reporting, including Articles 54 and 55.

BNN. Explanation of rehabilitation implementation based on Law 35 of 2009 and Joint Regulations of 7 Ministries.

Iroth, NK Implementation of Rehabilitation for Drug Users based on Article 54 of Law 35 of 2009. Lex Crimen 12(5), 2024.

Puspanlakuu DPR RI. Summary of rehabilitation norms in Law 35 of 2009.

Verbruggen, F. et al. A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task. eLife 8:e46323, 2019.

Greenhouse, I. and Wessel, J. EEG signatures associated with stopping are sensitive to preparation. Psychophysiology 50(9), 2013.

Huster, R. et al. Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. International Journal of Psychophysiology 87(3), 2013.

Benikos, N. et al. Varying task difficulty in the Go/NoGo task: effects on ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology 87(3), 2013.

Rectory simultaneous EEG-fMRI findings of N2 and P3 in inhibitory control and fronto-central networks.

Recent Go/No-Go studies confirm the relevance of P3 amplitude to behavioral response inhibition.

Development of low-cost portable EEG and feasibility of use by non-experts in resource-limited areas.

Morse, S. J. Neuroethics: Neurolaw. The Oxford Handbook of Topics in Philosophy, 2017.

Journal of Law and the Biosciences. Limited effect of EEG memory recognition evidence on assessments of defendant credibility. 2017.

McGill Journal of Law and Health. Neurotech, Cognition, and Justice: Can Neurolaw Bring Fairness to the Courts. 2021.

Scottish Legal News. Benjamin Bestgen: Neurolaw and mental privacy. 2020.

Law 5 of 2018 concerning Amendments to Law 15 of 2003. Summary of BPK JDIH material and metadata.

PP 77 of 2019 concerning the Prevention of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. JDIH BPK and Cabinet Secretariat.

Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, Article 54 and rehabilitation provisions. Summary of the DPR Law's Puspanlak and Flevin textual.

Verbruggen F et al. A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions in the stop-signal task. eLife 2019.

Benikos N et al. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/No-Go. Int J Psychophysiology 2013.

Huster RJ et al. Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: Functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiology 2013.

Baumeister S et al. Sequential inhibitory control processes assessed through simultaneous EEG–fMRI. NeuroImage 2014.

Huster RJ et al. Data-driven analysis of simultaneous EEG/fMRI reveals phenotypes of impulse control. Hum Brain Map 2016.

Morse SJ. The Status of Neurolaw: A Plea for Current Modesty and Future Cautious Optimism. 2011.

Morse SJ. Neuroscience, Free Will, and Criminal Responsibility. 2015.

Journal of Law and the Biosciences. The limited effect of EEG memory recognition evidence on assessments of defendant credibility. 2017.

Epileptic Disorders 2024. Low-cost portable EEG system with real-time guidance enables inexperienced users to record clinical-quality EEGs.

Sensors 2023. Design and Validation of a Low-Cost Mobile EEG-Based BCI [PMC access].

Bioelectronic Medicine 2023. Remote collection of electrophysiological data with brain wearables: opportunities and challenges.

Farahany NA. The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-24

Most read articles by the same author(s)