The Impact of Slum Rejuvenation on the Quality of Public Health in Tigalingga Village, Dairi Regency

Authors

  • Natanael Bangun Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Cut Nuraini Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Keywords:

Slum Rejuvenation, Public Health Quality, PHBS, Environmental Sanitation, Tigalingga Village

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of slum rejuvenation on public health in Tigalingga Village, Dairi Regency. The research method used was qualitative with a descriptive approach through interviews, observation, and documentation. The results showed that before the rejuvenation, the community lived in unhygienic environmental conditions, characterized by limited access to clean water, minimal sanitation facilities, and poor waste management. After the rejuvenation program, there was a significant improvement in environmental health and clean and healthy living behaviors (PHBS), as reflected in the increased ownership of healthy latrines, improved drainage systems, and more organized waste management. These changes resulted in a decrease in the number of environmentally related diseases such as diarrhea and acute respiratory infections (ARI). The main supporting factors for the program's success were government support and active community participation, while inhibiting factors included economic constraints and lack of facility maintenance. Thus, the slum rejuvenation program has been proven to have a positive impact on improving public health, but requires ongoing support to maintain its sustainability.

References

Bekele, T., et al. (2020). Effect of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions alone on health outcomes: a systematic review. BMJ Open

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: reflections and recommendations. Quality & Quantity

Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity

Caruso, B. A., et al. (2024). Systematic re-review of WASH trials to assess impacts on health outcomes. Nature

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2020). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches

Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Eisenhardt, K. (2022). Using the Gioia methodology for qualitative analysis and theory-building. Aalto University Research Portal Evidence from Indonesia

Henson, R. M., et al. (2020). Evaluating the health effects of place-based slum upgrading interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed Central (PMC)

Johnson, J. L., et al. (2020). A review of quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. PMC

Richards, G. C., et al. (2023). Assessing housing exposures and interventions that impact health. PubMed Central (PMC)

Saldana, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications

Simpson, A., et al. (2024). The impacts of housing conditions on physical and mental health: a review. Frontiers in Environmental Health

Tenny, S., & Brannan, G. (2022). Qualitative Study. StatPearls Publishing / NCBI

World Bank. (2024). Guidance Note on Community Participation in Slum Upgrading

Downloads

Published

2025-10-27

Most read articles by the same author(s)